The Moon Seems to Change Read Online

The theory that the moon landings were hoaxed by the US government to assert their victory in the space race over Russia, is something which has grown in popularity over time.

Contempo polls indicate that approximately 20% of Americans believe that the U.S. has never landed on the moon. Subsequently the Apollo missions ended in the seventies, why haven't nosotros ever been dorsum? Merely during the term of Richard Nixon did humanity ever country on the moon, and after Watergate most people wouldn't put it past Tricky Dick to fake them to put America in good continuing in the Cold State of war.

In this list I accept presented some of the proposed evidence to suggest that the moon landings were hoaxes. I tried to include NASA'south explanations to each entry to provide an objective perspective.

Conspiracy theorists have pointed out that when the showtime moon landing was shown on live television, viewers could clearly see the American flag waving and fluttering equally Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin planted information technology. Photos of the landing also seem to show rippling in a breeze, such as the image above which clearly shows a fold in the flag. The obvious trouble hither is that there's no air in the moon's atmosphere, and therefore no current of air to cause the flag to blow.

Countless explanations take been put forward to disprove this phenomenon as anything unusual: NASA claimed that the flag was stored in a thin tube and the rippled effect was caused by it being unfurled before being planted. Other explanations involve the ripples caused by the reaction forcefulness of the astronauts touching the aluminum pole, which is shown to shake in the video footage.

The claim goes as follows: had NASA really landed u.s.a. on the moon, in that location would be a blast crater underneath the lunar module to mark its landing. On whatsoever video footage or photograph of the landings, no crater is visible, almost as though the module was simply placed at that place. The surface of the moon is covered in fine lunar grit, and even this doesn't seem to have been displaced in photographic evidence.

Much like the waving flag theory, however, the lack of an impact crater has a slew of potential explanations. NASA maintains that the module required significantly less thrust in the low-gravity conditions than information technology would have washed on Globe. The surface of the moon itself is solid rock, then a blast crater probably wouldn't be feasible anyway – in the same style that an aeroplane doesn't leave a crater when it touches down on a concrete airstrip.

On the moon in that location is only one strong calorie-free source: the Dominicus. Then it's fair to suggest that all shadows should run parallel to one another. But this was not the case during the moon landing: videos and photographs clearly prove that shadows fall in different directions. Conspiracy theorists suggest that this must mean multiple lite sources are present -suggesting that the landing photos were taken on a film set up.

NASA has attempted to blame uneven landscape on the foreign shadows, with subtle bumps and hills on the moon'southward surface causing the discrepancies. This explanation has been tossed out the window by some theorists; how could hills crusade such large athwart differences? In the image above the lunar module'southward shadow conspicuously contradicts that of the rocks in the foreground at almost a 45 degree bending.

7

The Van Allen Radiation Belt

In social club to reach the moon, astronauts had to pass through what is known equally the Van Allen radiation belt. The chugalug is held in place by Earth'due south magnetic field and stays perpetually in the aforementioned place. The Apollo missions to the moon marked the offset ever attempts to ship living humans through the belt. Conspiracy theorists contend that the sheer levels of radiation would take cooked the astronauts en route to the moon, despite the layers of aluminum coating the interior and exterior of the spaceship.

NASA accept countered this argument by emphasizing the short amount of fourth dimension it took the astronauts to traverse the belt – significant they received only very small doses of radiations.

Subsequently photographs of the moon landings were released, theorists were quick to discover a mysterious object (shown in a higher place) in the reflection of an astronaut'due south helmet from the Apollo 12 mission. The object appears to be hanging from a rope or wire and has no reason to be there at all, leading some to suggest it is an overhead spotlight typically found in motion picture studios.

The resemblance is questionable, given the poor quality of the photograph, but the mystery remains as to why something is beingness suspended in mid-air (or rather lack of air) on the moon. The lunar module in other photos appears to have no extension from it that matches the photo, so the object still remains totally unexplained.

5

Slow-Motion Walking and Subconscious Cables

In order to back up claims that the moon landings were shot in a studio, conspiracy theorists had to business relationship for the apparent low-gravity conditions, which must have been mimicked by NASA. It has been suggested that if yous take the moon landing footage and increment the speed of the pic x2.5, the astronauts appear to be moving in Earth's gravity. Every bit for the astronaut'due south impressive jump elevation, which would exist impossible to perform in Globe'southward gravity, hidden cables and wires have been suggested every bit giving the astronauts some extra height. In some screenshots outlines of alleged hidden cables can be seen (the photograph in a higher place supposedly shows a wire, though it is extremely vague).

One compelling argument for the moon landing hoax is the total lack of stars in any of the photographic/video evidence. There are no clouds on the moon, and then stars are perpetually visible and significantly brighter than what we see through the filter of Earth's temper.

The argument here is that NASA would accept institute information technology impossible to map out the exact locations of all stars for the hoax without being rumbled, and therefore left them out – intentionally falling back on an excuse that the quality of the photographs washes them out (an alibi they did actually give).

Some photographs are high-quality, withal, and nonetheless however no stars are shown. Certainly eerie, because you lot can take pictures of stars from Earth in much lower quality and withal see them.

One of the almost famous photos from the moon landings shows a rock in the foreground, with what appears to be the letter "C" engraved into it. The letter appears to exist well-nigh perfectly symmetrical, meaning it is unlikely to be a natural occurrence. Information technology has been suggested that the stone is simply a prop, with the "C" used every bit a marking past an alleged flick crew. A prepare designer could have turned the rock the wrong way, accidentally exposing the marking to the photographic camera.

NASA has given alien excuses for the letter, on the one hand blaming a photographic programmer for adding the letter equally a practical joke, while on the other hand maxim that it may merely have been a devious hair which got tangled upwards somewhere in the developing process.

two

The Layered Cross-hairs

The cameras used past astronauts during the moon landings had a multitude of cross-hairs to aid with scaling and direction. These are imprinted over the summit of all photographs. Some of the images, withal, clearly bear witness the cross-hairs backside objects in the scene, implying that photographs may accept been edited or doctored afterwards beingness taken. The photograph shown above is not an isolated occurrence. Many objects are shown to be in front of the cross-hairs, including the American flag in ane motion picture and the lunar rover in some other.

Conspiracy theorists accept suggested NASA printed the man-fabricated objects over a legitimate photograph of the moon to hoax the landings – although if they really planned on doing this, then why they used cantankerous-hairs in the first place is a mystery.

The two photos from the Apollo xv mission shown above conspicuously have identical backdrops, despite being officially listed past NASA equally having been taken miles apart. 1 photograph even shows the lunar module. When all photographs were taken the module had already landed, so how tin it peradventure be at that place for 1 photo and disappear in another? Well, if you're a hardcore conspiracy theorist, it may seem viable that NASA only used the aforementioned backdrop when filming unlike scenes of their moon landing videos.

NASA has suggested that since the moon is much smaller than Earth, horizons can appear significantly closer to the human being heart. Despite this, to say that the ii hills visible in the photographs are miles apart is incontrovertibly faux.

+

The Stanley Kubrick Theory

This loose extension of the popular conspiracy theory states that acclaimed film manager Stanley Kubrick was approached by the US government to hoax the first 3 moon landings. There are two main branches of this somewhat implausible theory: one group of believers maintain that Kubrick was approached afterward he released 2001: A Space Odyssey (released in 1968, one year before the first moon landing), afterwards NASA came to appreciate the stunning realism of the motion picture's outer-space scenes at that fourth dimension; another group contends that Kubrick was groomed by the government to picture the moon landing long before this, and that 2001: A Space Odyssey was a staged practice run for him.

So what testify might back up such claims? Well: apparently, if you watch The Shining (another Kubrick picture), you can pick upwardly on some declared messages subconscious by Kubrick to subtly inform the world of his part in the conspiracy. The virtually obvious is the kid's Apollo 11 shirt worn in only ane scene. Another supposed jewel is the line written on Jack Nicholson'south character's typewriter: "All work and no play makes Jack a deadening male child", in which the discussion "all" tin exist interpreted as A11, or Apollo 11.

If you aren't convinced yet, Kubrick made the mysterious hotel room in the film number 237. Guess how many miles it is from here to the moon: 238,000. So divide that by a thousand and minus one, and you've got 1 airtight theory correct there.

figueroakelp1966.blogspot.com

Source: https://listverse.com/2012/12/28/10-reasons-the-moon-landings-could-be-a-hoax/

Share this post